Neil Gaiman
Journal Neil"s Work Cool Stuff & Things About Neil Message Boards Where"s Neil Search MouseCircus.Com FAQs
You are here: Home » Journal
Archives  |  RSS  |  Translations  |  Labels

Tuesday, April 08, 2008

Warning: low-flying introductions...

Expect occasional introductions to show up here -- it seems more fun to throw them up on the blog from time to time and let the Webgoblin start collecting them than it would be to just email him every introduction I can find and open a well-stocked new department in Cool Stuff (which is http://www.neilgaiman.com/p/Cool_Stuff for those of you reading this on feeds).

This is the introduction for Joe Sanders' collection of academic papers about The Sandman, The Sandman Papers, published by Fantagraphics a few years back.


There’s introductions and there’s introductions and there’s introductions, and then there’s ones like this where I’m introducing a book that has some kind of connection to me, and I have no idea what I can really add to the book in your hand. Still, I need to try.

I once – at the International Conference on the Fantastic in the Arts, in Florida, some years ago – went to a presentation of three papers on my work (one of which is reprinted here), and after each paper was presented, I was asked if I would like to make some reply, which is honestly a bit like asking someone who has just undergone an autopsy if he’d like to talk about the experience. (My replies varied, at least in memory, from “Er, thanks. That was very nice of you,” to an “Er, with respect, if you read the issue you’ve cited, I don’t believe it actually says what you think it does”. But possibly I just smiled and nodded.)

Those were, however – with the exception of pointing out the occasional objective mistake – simply my opinions, and I don’t consider them to be privileged. Once you’ve written something it’s not yours any longer: it belongs to other people, and they all have opinions about it, and every single one of those opinions is as correct as that of the author – more so, perhaps. Because those people have read the work as something perfectly new, and, barring amnesia, an author is never going to be able to do that. There will be too many ghost-versions of the story in the way, and besides, the author cannot read it for the first time, wondering what happens next, comparing it to other things that he or she has read.

So while I may, opinionated myself, disagree with some of the conclusions presented here, I am quite content for the opinions to exist; after all, the people who came to them read the work for the first time, which is more than I’ve ever managed. Sometimes I’ve had my eyes opened by papers on something I’d written, and noticed that there was something else there than I had intended. I’ve been praised for unintentional cleverness and damned for things I don’t actually think I did. And I’ve always enjoyed it, perhaps because I’ve always had a healthy respect for academia. Even when I'm puzzled by it, it treats art like it matters. And for those of us who make art, that’s a fine thing to experience.

I’m always particularly delighted by academic attention to comics – partly because I think we need the best critical minds to point to what we do and explain it to ourselves, and partly, even mostly, because it shows how much things are changing. (A decade ago I was invited to speak at one major American university by the art department, and was informed, apologetically, that the English department were, ah, boycotting my talk, because, after all, I did comics. These days the invitations come from the English departments...)

One thing I know that I can say is that Joe Sanders (there are two people of that name in this book, just to confuse you. I’m talking about the editor) is not only a fine and perspicacious critic, and an excellent teacher, but he has also proved quite indefatigable in bringing this book into the world. I hope this book will prove to be only the beginning of the printed and collected dialogue between those who do comics and those who tell us what we did.

Neil Gaiman
January 10, 2006
....

It is a terrible thing to read a series of Amazon book reviews and find yourself sniggering like a schoolboy. But I read this and sniggered.

Labels: , ,

Monday, April 23, 2007

no cheese-based rants here

Most of yesterday's post got eaten by blogger, which is probably a good thing as it began with a lengthy rant about my disappointment with the dire soft yellow muck in a red wax Wallis-and-Gromited casing that calls itself Wensleydale that you can now buy in America, and how it's nothing at all like a proper Wensleydale (all white and nutty and crumbly and not in America), which would probably have left everyone reading this convinced that I was the kind of mad old man who writes about cheese and lost me any cool points I still possess.

Anyway, I'm now at Bryn Mawr, and Holly is eating the contents of the gift basket from the English department while I decide what I'm going to read tonight.

...

Am I crazy or was there a post about John Cale and Dave McKean up a while ago that is no longer there? Because, if I am crazy, I probably ought to know before I go teach 6th graders tomorrow (not that it would make much of a difference--being a bit crazy would probably help).
Thanks for your entertaining blog, btw...


It's still there -- http://www.neilgaiman.com/journal/2007/02/cale-mckean-cat-bag.html -- and I found it the way I always find things on this site. I open a Google window and type site:neilgaiman.com and then whatever search terms I'm looking for.

Once I'd found it I tried the website's SEARCH feature and discovered that I couldn't find the Cale McKean entry using it, no matter how I tried. I'm still not clear why the people who did the big redesign on the site a few years ago got rid of a working Google search page for their own thing that doesn't work very well. It's on the list of things to fix, and I'm sure the webelf will. For now, if you're looking for something on this site I suggest you Google site:neilgaiman.com and then search away. Sorry about that.

Hello Mr. Gaiman... (I like dots...)

At the signing in that snowy hell of Leipzig you said there's a plan to round up all thesis that have been about your work and putting them on a page. Do you still consider doing something like this?

Greetings Thomas


It's definitely something I think someone ought to do as a resource. People hand me theses and papers on my stuff at signings, and many of the ones I look at seem to be covering similar ground, which makes me crinkle my brow and think that it would be easier for people if there was somewhere that academic work already done could be posted or available and be easily consulted. Back when the Dreaming website was active some papers were collected and posted there, and they are still up at http://www.holycow.com/dreaming/academia/

It's definitely something that needs to happen.

...

There's a review of the UK NEVERWHERE DVD at http://www.thestage.co.uk/tvtoday/2007/04/tv_dvd_catherine_tate_hustle_neverwhere.php
and it appears that there are no extras at all on it. Not even the rather bemused commentary that I did for the US version (which is Region 0 and will play in UK players). I'm really sorry. There's so much cool stuff we could have put on a Neverwhere DVD, if there was time or the will to do it. Sigh.

...

And while I am at Bryn Mawr, the Birdchick is arriving at my house with bees. I wish I was there for the introduction of Bees to Hives, and hope that Sharon blogs about it.

Meanwhile, having read,

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/24/science/24bees.htm

I'm just glad to be doing my part in the rebeeing of America.

Labels: , , , ,

<< Previous [Home] Next >>
Archives  |  RSS  |  Translations  |  Labels



Study in Emerald (audio story)
Free audio story!

 

For the latest news and articles about Neil, the Universe, and Everything, go and bookmark Lucy Anne's The Dreaming at del.icio.us.

 

My current crusade is to make sure creative people have wills. Read the blog post about it, and see a sample will.